<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fossils are Evidence of a World-Wide Flood</title>
	<atom:link href="http://x-evolutionist.com/the-fossil-record-evidence-of-the-world-wide-flood-of-the-bible/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://x-evolutionist.com</link>
	<description>Reasons Why I Believe in God</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 12:55:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://x-evolutionist.com/the-fossil-record-evidence-of-the-world-wide-flood-of-the-bible/#comment-4279</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 02:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://x-evolutionist.com/fossils#comment-4279</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You say “The earth is only thousands of years old and not millions of years old” so far you have not proved that this is true or explain away flaws in your own logic. Like how the food is the cause of fossils. The flood is also created the canyons. The Grand Canyon has fossils. So somehow the fossils were laid down in layer in the Grand Canyon and yet was somehow carved out of this layered rock at the same time!!!!! This makes no sense.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You say “The earth is only thousands of years old and not millions of years old” so far you have not proved that this is true or explain away flaws in your own logic. Like how the food is the cause of fossils. The flood is also created the canyons. The Grand Canyon has fossils. So somehow the fossils were laid down in layer in the Grand Canyon and yet was somehow carved out of this layered rock at the same time!!!!! This makes no sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://x-evolutionist.com/the-fossil-record-evidence-of-the-world-wide-flood-of-the-bible/#comment-4241</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 11:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://x-evolutionist.com/fossils#comment-4241</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Do you the really big problem that you have with disputing the fossil record and saying that Noah&#039;s flood is the only cause is that you then have to explain how  there can be fossils in the Grand Canyon and yet still have the Grand Canyon form. That makes no sense.

Now about the Grand Canyon. It isn&#039;t straight. In fact it winds it&#039;s way through Colorado Plateau in the same way that any river does. If, as according to answersingenesis, it was created in a few days then it should have caved a straight trench. Can you please explain.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you the really big problem that you have with disputing the fossil record and saying that Noah&#8217;s flood is the only cause is that you then have to explain how  there can be fossils in the Grand Canyon and yet still have the Grand Canyon form. That makes no sense.</p>
<p>Now about the Grand Canyon. It isn&#8217;t straight. In fact it winds it&#8217;s way through Colorado Plateau in the same way that any river does. If, as according to answersingenesis, it was created in a few days then it should have caved a straight trench. Can you please explain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://x-evolutionist.com/the-fossil-record-evidence-of-the-world-wide-flood-of-the-bible/#comment-4234</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 09:40:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://x-evolutionist.com/fossils#comment-4234</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Surely you would agree with Stephen Gould that it doesn&#039;t matter if  &quot;Transitional forms are generally lacking at the species level&quot; beacuse as you have clearly stated &quot;Each basic kind of animal has the capacity for adapting to any ecological zone they come across.&quot; which shows that for you a Kind has a taxonomic rank of an Order. Well below the need taxonomic rank of species.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surely you would agree with Stephen Gould that it doesn&#8217;t matter if  &#8220;Transitional forms are generally lacking at the species level&#8221; beacuse as you have clearly stated &#8220;Each basic kind of animal has the capacity for adapting to any ecological zone they come across.&#8221; which shows that for you a Kind has a taxonomic rank of an Order. Well below the need taxonomic rank of species.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://x-evolutionist.com/the-fossil-record-evidence-of-the-world-wide-flood-of-the-bible/#comment-4231</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 09:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://x-evolutionist.com/fossils#comment-4231</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You say Stephen Gould &quot;believed in evolution but did not believe that the fossil evidence supported that belief.&quot; 

Now lets see what he really thought. From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Punctuated_equilibrium#Common_misconceptions

&#039;In an often quoted remark, Gould stated, &quot;Since we proposed punctuated equilibria to explain trends, it is infuriating to be quoted again and again by creationists—whether through design or stupidity, I do not know—as admitting that the fossil record includes no transitional forms. Transitional forms are generally lacking at the species level, but they are abundant between larger groups.&quot;&#039; 
I guess this quote shows that very much yes he did believe that the evidence did support Evolution.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You say Stephen Gould &#8220;believed in evolution but did not believe that the fossil evidence supported that belief.&#8221; </p>
<p>Now lets see what he really thought. From <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Punctuated_equilibrium#Common_misconceptions" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Punctuated_equilibrium#Common_misconceptions</a></p>
<p>&#8216;In an often quoted remark, Gould stated, &#8220;Since we proposed punctuated equilibria to explain trends, it is infuriating to be quoted again and again by creationists—whether through design or stupidity, I do not know—as admitting that the fossil record includes no transitional forms. Transitional forms are generally lacking at the species level, but they are abundant between larger groups.&#8221;&#8216;<br />
I guess this quote shows that very much yes he did believe that the evidence did support Evolution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://x-evolutionist.com/the-fossil-record-evidence-of-the-world-wide-flood-of-the-bible/#comment-4221</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 06:20:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://x-evolutionist.com/fossils#comment-4221</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you so much for commenting on this article. Your just too wonderful.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you so much for commenting on this article. Your just too wonderful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

