Comments on: Wolves, Coyotes and Dogs are the Same Species http://x-evolutionist.com Reasons Why I Believe in God Tue, 20 Dec 2011 12:55:53 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Matt http://x-evolutionist.com/using-the-dog-kind-of-animal-to-disprove-evolution/#comment-4599 Fri, 16 Dec 2011 22:36:31 +0000 http://x-evolutionist.com/the-dog-kind-2#comment-4599 But we have made them. We have selectively breed wolves to get dogs just as we have selectively breed crops or sheep or cows. Darwin had two big ideas.

The first was that the only difference between what nature does (Natural Selection) and what we humans do (Artificial Selection) is the fact that we are doing it. That’s it. Now on this page X-Evolutionist agrees with this. But on other pages of the website he disbelieves this. So X-Evolutionist which one is it?

The second big idea was that of common ancestry. All this means is that all life on Earth is related. This is what X-Evolutionist is against. That said all of the evidence that we have supports this on Earth. Now that’s not to say that that there can’t have been multiple starting points (and there would have to be if life formed on other planets) but that here on Earth all life appears to have come from just the one.

One of the biggest evidence is that the all life either has DNA and RNA or just RNA as the genetic code. This is universal. Also the way that this is code is translated into proteins is almost Universal (3 bases pairs gives 20 amino acids). These exceptions are only different by a very slight amount (3 bases pairs gives 22 amino acids). In fact we have created in the lab far more different (3 bases pairs gives 40 amino acids and the use of up to 5 base pairs)

]]> By: Lacy http://x-evolutionist.com/using-the-dog-kind-of-animal-to-disprove-evolution/#comment-4535 Wed, 07 Dec 2011 21:54:08 +0000 http://x-evolutionist.com/the-dog-kind-2#comment-4535 Dogs ARE wolves, is what this person is trying to say, and a wolf is not man-made.

]]> By: ten13grl http://x-evolutionist.com/using-the-dog-kind-of-animal-to-disprove-evolution/#comment-4522 Mon, 05 Dec 2011 10:49:50 +0000 http://x-evolutionist.com/the-dog-kind-2#comment-4522 Using dogs to prove that God is real is like using TVs prove that God is real. Dogs are a completely man-made animal, so neither God or nature had anything to do with them. Apologies that you don’t understand history or get how science works.

]]> By: Matt http://x-evolutionist.com/using-the-dog-kind-of-animal-to-disprove-evolution/#comment-4256 Fri, 21 Oct 2011 22:36:09 +0000 http://x-evolutionist.com/the-dog-kind-2#comment-4256 Correction in above. From “that applies to bacteria which do mate” to “that applies to bacteria which do NOT mate”. sorry about that.

]]> By: Matt http://x-evolutionist.com/using-the-dog-kind-of-animal-to-disprove-evolution/#comment-4255 Fri, 21 Oct 2011 22:33:36 +0000 http://x-evolutionist.com/the-dog-kind-2#comment-4255 Now lets use your definition of kinds and species “If an animal can mate and reproduce, they are the same kind/species.” How do you think that applies to bacteria which do mate as they reproduce asexually. Would you think that they aren’t a kind or would you agree that we need another definition of the word species/kinds to include them. If so how would you now define it?

]]>